GoodwinMalatesta - Fellow Members of The Association of Law Costs Draftsmen practising in compliance with the Byelaws & Code of Conduct of the ALCD.

   

 

The Increasing Demand for Costs Budgeting

November 2009

The cost of civil litigation is continually being debated and new rules or practice directions are being introduced.  Lord Jacksonís 600+ page Civil Litigation Costs Review bears testament to the need to control the cost of litigation.

 

Much of the debate has centred around costs in defamation actions.  This has led to the introduction of a pilot costs budgeting scheme which will operate in the Royal Courts of Justice and District Registry in Manchester until 30 September 2010.

 

This pilot scheme, contained in the Civil Procedure Rules as Practice Direction 51D, sets out a process where very detailed costs budgets are exchanged and filed with the court at various stages of the proceedings.  It also introduces costs management conferences when the court may make directions to control the costs of an action based on the costs budgets and arguments made by each party.

 

Importantly, any judge conducting an assessment of costs will have regard to the budget estimates filed by the receiving party and unless there has been a significant change in circumstances the judge will approve as reasonable and proportionate any costs claimed which fall within the last approved budget.  Save in exceptional circumstances the judge will not approve as reasonable and proportionate any costs claimed which do not fall within the last approved budget.  The management of your own costs and the critical examination of opponentís costs will now be more important than ever.

 

We have considerable experience in costs budgeting in civil litigation including defamation proceedings and consequently have the expertise to complete the daunting 9 page costs budgets now required.  Under the scheme it will also be vitally important to raise issues on the costs budgets filed by your opponent to prevent the court from approving an amount that is unreasonable and disproportionate.  As specialists in the opposition of legal costs we are able to provide speedy advice and summary points of issue in respect of the opponentís costs budgets.

 

We charge fixed fees for preparing and updating the costs budgets and charge on a time spent basis for advising on opponentís costs and preparing summary points of issue.

 

Please contact Malcolm Goodwin if you would like more information regarding the pilot scheme and our services.



<< Go back

 

     
    The information on this site is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute professional advice, whether legal or otherwise, and does not purport to be comprehensive. Goodwin Malatesta Cost Control is the trading name of Goodwin Malatesta Cost Control Ltd. and does not accept responsibility for loss that may arise from accessing or relying upon the information contained in this site. The contents of this site are protected by copyright. You may read the contents and make copies for your own personal use. You may also give copies of reasonable extracts on an occasional basis free of charge to your contacts for their personal use provided that Goodwin Malatesta Cost Control Ltd. is acknowledged as the source, the text is not altered in any way, and this warning is brought to their attention. Any other use or copying of the contents of this site is prohibited, unless Goodwin Malatesta Cost Control Ltd. gives its prior written consent.

Date:19 November 2017     Time:14:23:02